Andrew Mobbs (mobbsy) wrote,
Andrew Mobbs
mobbsy

So, the recent defence spending review is essentially a continuation of the idea that there isn't going to be a big war, just lots of small ones. It's assumed that UK interests are unlikely to be threatened by submarines in the near future, which has meant a lot of naval reductions and some anti-submarine air-force reductions. It's also assumed that the UK will not want to fight a large land-war without American help, so the number of heavy tanks, artillery and attack aircraft are being reduced. Instead the focus is on light and medium forces that can be rapidly sent overseas, probably as part of a coalition.

Overall, the amount of money given to the military is actually slightly increasing, but not by much. The UK is at the upper end of OECD countries in terms of military expenditure; but by no means exceptional.

The amount that UK spends allows very successful operations such as Sierra Leone and the Operation Telic (current operations in Southern Iraq) and potential intervention in the Sudan; it also allows the potential to defend overseas territories such as when the Falklands were attacked by a military government. However, it also allowed politicians to decide to take an active role in the in the initial invasion of Iraq and costs 10s of billions of pounds every year that could be spent on other things.

What do people think? Should the UK spend this much, or should we be aiming to be more like Ireland or New Zealand? If we didn't spend so much would we be failing in a moral duty by not being able to maintain peace, or acting more morally by not employing force?

I'm generally of the opinion that democratic intervention under international law is morally correct, we should have done more earlier in Kosovo, we should have done something in Rwanda. The assumptions about the lack of a major threat, and the reliance on the US to cover that risk worry me from an historical perspective, but I can't deny that it looks like that is the situation and that spending money covering a risk that probably won't be realised is wasteful. I appreciate a body which I have some democratic rights within keeping itself as a significant influence in global politics. Overall, I don't think I'm unhappy with the decisions that have been made.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 4 comments