Andrew Mobbs (mobbsy) wrote,
Andrew Mobbs
mobbsy

Hm... that's just taking the piss.

In short, at the end of October IBM published a TPC-C benchmark on dual-core Xeons. It was the fastest four-way¹ TPC-C benchmark recorded. A couple of slight problems though, it came in at $8.27/tpmC (price/performance ratio), when competing benchmarks on Opterons were about $2.3/tpmC and even on Itaniums and POWER5 were more like $4/tpmC. Also the listed availability date for the hardware was 31st of March 2006.

At the start of December, HP published a benchmark on their dual-core Opteron DL585. It beat the IBM system, it was $2.02/tpmC, and there was immediate availability of hardware. The real kicker? Just like the IBM benchmark, HP used the IBM DB2 database system running on Windows.

¹ Counting lumps of silicon not independent processors. Multi-core CPUs have really confused the way people categorise multiprocessor benchmarks.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 1 comment