Andrew Mobbs (mobbsy) wrote,
Andrew Mobbs
mobbsy

Vaguely wondering how Apple managed to get such abysmal SPEC scores for P4s. Looks like they're only publishing GCC 3.3 base scores. I'd be interested in a full disclosure, like was IA32 SPECfp running with SSE2 instructions? Hopefully they'll be published, but Apple has a habit of not playing in public benchmarks (which is a defensible position, but unhelpful). What those figures mostly tell us is that Intel have a superb compiler team, but we knew that already. One does wonder why Apple didn't use the IBM C compiler, my suspicion is that GCC is proportionately worse for IA32 than PowerPC.

All in though, I'd expect the 970 to be pretty damn quick regardless, the POWER4 core is very nice, and has impressive FP itself, though the ones I've used all had silly amounts of cache. A 1GHz Hypertransport bus is definitely good move, as is the 400MHz memory bus, a dual 1.4GHz G4 must be incredibly crippled by the shared 166MHz bus.
Subscribe

  • (no subject)

    Last week I poured the cremated remains of my father into a river. From there, that material will flow through the town he lived in, into the sea,…

  • Moving house!

    We're moving house soon… details to follow in a less public post, or email me. However, we're getting rid of some bits and pieces of…

  • (no subject)

    Yesterday, I made sausages. This was sufficiently exciting to cause me to actually write something on LJ for once. One of our wedding gifts was a…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 2 comments